Aider Polyglot
12 models tested · Updated 2025-08-07 · Verified sources only
GPT-5 leads at 88.0%
1
OpenAI · aider.chat/leaderboard · 2025-08-07
Top score on 225 Exercism exercises across 6 languages. Uses high reasoning setting.
88.0%
2
OpenAI · aider.chat/leaderboard · 2025-06-10
Second highest on Aider polyglot. High reasoning mode.
84.9%
3
Google · aider.chat/leaderboard · 2025-03-25
Third on Aider polyglot with 32k think budget.
83.1%
4
OpenAI · Aider/aider.chat · 2025-06-25
o3 high reasoning effort matches GPT-5 low at 81.3%. Cost $21 vs GPT-5 low at $10.
81.3%
5
OpenAI · Aider/aider.chat · 2025-08-25
GPT-5 at low reasoning effort. Full effort hits 88%. Cost only $10 at low effort.
81.3%
6
xAI · Aider.chat Leaderboard · 2026-04-01
Fourth on Aider polyglot leaderboard. Strong multi-language code editing.
79.6%
7
Anthropic · Blog/Anthropic · 2026-04-16
Up 7pp from Opus 4.6 (72.0%). Strong multi-language code editing.
79.0%
8
DeepSeek · Aider/aider.chat leaderboard · 2025-12-01
Best open-weight Aider Polyglot score. 22x cheaper than GPT-5 per run. Evaluated by aider.chat leaderboard on 225 Exercism exercises.
74.2%
9
Anthropic · aider.chat/leaderboard · 2026-02-05
32k thinking budget. Gap to GPT-5 highlights agentic coding is Anthropic weakness vs OpenAI.
72.0%
10
DeepSeek · Aider/aider.chat leaderboard · 2025-12-01
Chat mode variant, 4 points below Reasoner mode. Cost-efficient at $0.88/run.
70.2%
11
Qwen · arxiv/2603.00729 · 2026-02-28
Outperforms Qwen3-Coder-480B (60.4) on Aider polyglot with 3B active params, showing code editing strength.
66.2%
12
Moonshot AI · Aider/aider.chat · 2025-07-17
Open-weight MoE, 1T params / 32B active. Competitive cost at $1.24 but below DeepSeek V3 performance.
59.1%