Perfect score on math competition. No tools enabled.

Perfect score on AIME 2025. Matches GPT-5.2 ceiling — AIME may be saturated for frontier models.

AIME 2025 pass@1 with Python interpreter access. 100% consensus@8. Retired Feb 2026. Tool-assisted score — not directly comparable to models without tool access.

AIME 2025 with tool use. Edges out gpt-oss-120b (97.9%). Remarkable for a 3.6B active param model.

Near-perfect AIME score. ByteDance reports gold medals on major math olympiads.

AIME 2024+2025 combined (60 questions). New AIME SOTA.

AIME 2025 with tool use. Also scores 96.6% on AIME 2024 (tools). Apache 2.0 open-weight.

Open-weight MoE (196B total, 11B active). Reaches 99.9 with PaCoRe parallel thinking. Best open model on AIME.

MathArena AIME 2026. 95% without tools, 100% with code execution. Top math performance.

AIME 2025. Strong math reasoning for a 13B-active MoE model.

1T MoE, 32B active. Open-source. Averaged over 32 runs on AIME 2025.

AIME 2025. Deep reasoning variant. SOTA-level math, surpasses GPT-5 (94.6).

AIME 2025, 23k thinking tokens. Extended reasoning variant.

AIME 2026 competition. MathArena independent evaluation, 3rd place behind Step-3.5-Flash (96.67).

Open-weight 400B model. Highest AIME score among open models, competitive with GPT-5.4.

Highest AIME score among Qwen models. Strong math reasoning, competitive with Gemini 3 Pro (96.7) and Kimi K2.5 (96.1).

AIME 2026 competition. MathArena independent evaluation, 4th place.

AIME 2025 without tools. Strong but not perfect — Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2 both hit 100%.

AIME 2026. 685B MoE params with DeepSeek Sparse Attention. Top-tier math reasoning.

Advanced math reasoning. Anthropic official benchmarks page.

Joint highest AIME 2024 at time of release. Third-party verified.

AIME 2025, Pass@1. Open-weight, 685B MoE. Matches GPT-5 on reasoning.

Mid-tier model in Seed 2.0 family. Handles 95% of enterprise workloads at half the Pro cost.

AIME 2026 I. On par with Kimi K2.5 (92.5) and DeepSeek V3.2 (92.7).

Without tools (closed-book). With tools achieves 99.5%. Best-performing small reasoning model on AIME.

MathArena AIME 2026. A 9B model matching frontier math scores. Remarkable reasoning-per-parameter.

30B-A3B MoE with only 3.6B active params. Strong math reasoning for a lightweight model.

AIME 2026. Strong math reasoning from open-weight MoE model.

AIME 2026. Exceptional math reasoning for a 27B model — near frontier-class.

Independent user corroborates Google's AIME score; 0 engagement

Without tools. Hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE, 3.3x throughput vs Qwen3-30B on H200.

MoE with only 3.8B active params outperforms many larger models.

India's first domestically-trained 105B model. MoE with 10.3B active params. Apache 2.0.

Competitive math reasoning. Behind Claude Opus 4.5 (91.0) but ahead of Sonnet 4.5 (88.0).

SFT+RL variant of Phi-4-reasoning. 14B model hitting 81%+ on AIME 2024 — remarkable for size.

Strong math reasoning for a Haiku-tier model. Extended thinking with 128K budget.

14B dense model. Matches DeepSeek-R1 (671B) on AIME despite 47x fewer params.

Impressive for a 4B model running on T4 GPUs. MoE architecture.

Matches Gemma 3 27B despite being a fraction of the size. Built-in reasoning capability.